ringman2SEP. 07, 2015 - 08:48PM JST"wrong turn at spraltys"?... or maybe China knows Diayou/senkakus belong to them?"senkakus are protected"?... not by the way China enters the waters constantly
without Japan/USA doing anything as if they welcome China to do so (perhaps bssed on the mutual understanding last november in Beijing when Japan conceded that China has its own rightful claim to the islands as per their 4-point agreement)
“在南沙群島轉(zhuǎn)錯(cuò)了方向”……或者有可能是中國(guó)知道釣魚(yú)島/尖閣列島是屬于他們的？“釣魚(yú)島區(qū)域是受保護(hù)的”？……
不是說(shuō)中國(guó)在沒(méi)有日本/美國(guó)的陪同下，不斷進(jìn)出該水域，卻什么都不做，而好像是他們歡迎中國(guó)來(lái)這樣做的（也許是基于去年11月在北京形成的共同理解，那時(shí)根據(jù)四點(diǎn)協(xié)議，日本承認(rèn)了中國(guó)對(duì)該島擁有合法所有權(quán)）
Peeping_TomSEP. 07, 2015 - 09:35PM JST"barking dog never bites"Actually Japan is not barking; they’re quiet, making you believe they’re asleep.Entering the waters and exiting soon after is one thing; let China attempt a landing and you'll see if Japan can only bark.Do you think that
the waters around the Senkakus are not "infested" with Japan's subs? What to you think the X-Band radar is doing in Okinawa?I can see China getting another smack, just like they've always got from the Japanese.This will not be a land war where 2.5 million
Chinese troops will make a difference.Only those totally oblivious can't see that in a maritime war, China is going to lose, badly.Why do you think China is not as assertive in the Senkakus, versus what they're been doing in the South China Sea?
“只會(huì)狂叫的狗不會(huì)咬人”實(shí)際上，日本并沒(méi)有在狂吠，他們很安靜，讓你相信他們是在沉睡。進(jìn)入該水域與不久一會(huì)兒就退出，這是一樣的；就讓中國(guó)嘗試登陸吧，然后你就會(huì)明白日本是不是只會(huì)狂吠。
你認(rèn)為尖閣列島周?chē)乃騼?nèi)沒(méi)有日本潛艇出沒(méi)嗎？那你認(rèn)為沖繩島的X波段雷達(dá)是做什么用的？我可以看到中國(guó)又要被揍一頓了，就像他們一直被日本人揍的那樣。土地爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn)中250億的中國(guó)軍隊(duì)也不會(huì)起到什么作用。
只有那些完全不在意的才會(huì)看不到海上戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中的這一點(diǎn),中國(guó)將會(huì)落敗，敗得很慘。不然相比起中國(guó)在南中國(guó)海的所作所為，你覺(jué)得為什么中國(guó)在釣魚(yú)島就沒(méi)有了自信？
avigatorSEP. 07, 2015 - 11:10PM JSTNo intrusion here since these islands belong to China or Taiwan. But that is up to them how they will handle it. Hear it from two japan/diaohist.html or from a New Zealand professor, Martin Lohmeyer: ... thesis_fulltext.pdf
And yes, there is another article refuting Lohmeyer's thesis. But it does not mean he is in the wrong. He goes by lontheworld13 an here is his article:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELlyvl3Gx8M
I am not biased against either country because I do not have any affinity towards either one, (married to Chinese or Japanese, living in either country). It is simple facts and information that is omitted by those in control of World events.
因?yàn)檫@些島嶼都是屬于中國(guó)或臺(tái)灣的，所以這里沒(méi)有入侵。但是他們要怎么處理這件事是他們的自由。聽(tīng)聽(tīng)日本的兩個(gè)大學(xué)教授和歷史學(xué)家的說(shuō)法吧：或者是來(lái)自一位新西蘭教授，Martin Lohmeye的說(shuō)法r:
... thesis_fulltext.pdf是的,還有另一篇反駁Lohmeyer論文的文章。但這并不意味著他就是錯(cuò)的。
他用的ID是lontheworld13，下面是他的文章我對(duì)兩國(guó)都沒(méi)有偏見(jiàn),因?yàn)槲遗c任何一方都沒(méi)有密切關(guān)系(與中國(guó)人或日本人結(jié)了婚,生活在兩個(gè)國(guó)家中的一個(gè))。這是在世界事件控制中，被忽視了的簡(jiǎn)單的事實(shí)和信息。
