JeffAshe George C • 17 days ago

　　Not yet operational. Counter-measures against lasers are relatively easy to implement, but not so against the good ol" fashion wall of lead and tungsten.

　　還不能操作吧。很容易就可以采取措施來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)激光武器，但是面對(duì)傳統(tǒng)武器時(shí)就沒(méi)那么容易了。

　　Voice_of_Reason JeffAshe • 14 hours ago

　　we"ve had CIWS for decades. and decoys. and countermeasures. and missiles designed to shoot down other missiles.

　　幾十年前我們就已經(jīng)擁有了近程武器系統(tǒng)，誘捕，應(yīng)對(duì)措施以及導(dǎo)彈來(lái)?yè)袈鋽橙说娘w彈。

　　neilperry71 • 19 days ago

　　Unfortunately, violence knows no bounds.

　　不幸的是，暴力沒(méi)有邊界。

　　Potarick neilperry71 • 18 days ago

　　None whatsoever, which is why nukes are around to put an abrupt end to all our cat-n-mousing adventurism!

　　確實(shí)沒(méi)有，所以才需要核武器來(lái)制止貓捉老鼠般的冒險(xiǎn)行為。

　　George C • 17 days ago

        God Bless America!

　　USA #1 Always and Forever!

　　Enjoy~!

　　美國(guó)永遠(yuǎn)都將是世界第一！

　　好好享受吧！

　　Voice_of_Reason • 14 hours ago

　　From what I understand, it"s harder to shoot down high-g maneuvering, sea-skimming, high-subsonic missiles than supersonic or hypersonic ones.

　　CIWS is not something you want to depend on - it"s just the last backup. Success rate against real threats is no where near 90%.

　　據(jù)我所知，比起擊落超音速和高超音速導(dǎo)彈，擊落高機(jī)動(dòng)性、掠海飛行的高亞音速導(dǎo)彈更加困難。

　　近程武器系統(tǒng)不是你能依賴的東西——這屬于最后的支援。在面對(duì)真正的威脅時(shí)，這種系統(tǒng)的成功率根本無(wú)法達(dá)到90%。