最后，當下雖然沒有國家部署高超音速導彈，但任何中國的潛在對手，比如美國，在可預見的將來要部署的幾乎可以肯定是遠程導彈（例如，作為「即時全球攻擊」系統(tǒng)的一部分）。1130近程反導系統(tǒng)甚至不能擊落中程或遠程亞音速導彈，所以應該拿超高音速導彈沒轍。

　　評論翻譯

　　Chirpoevec • 19 days agoAaaand... that`s it?... This system is 4 years old; it can hit targets on Mach4 (no claim about Mach5 is done); and nobody deployed hypersonic missiles? And all of it should make Type 1130 toothless? Well, as far as I can say 4 years old do NOT pass for

　　obsolete. In fact, another TNI author Dave Majumdar  says that ten times older Russian designs (P800, for exemple) are still quite capable to hit hard and inevitably.And that "no country currently deploys hypersonic missiles" claim... Do not ICBMs

　　qualify as hypersonic missiles? And, as a matter of fact, are not Chinese anti-aircraft systems just that - anti-ship ICBMs?

　　那個防御系統(tǒng)已經(jīng)部署了四年，它可以擊落4馬赫的目標（還沒有說可以擊落5馬赫的目標）。還沒有國家部署過高超音速導彈嗎？沒有國家部署過高超音速導彈就意味著1130型沒有用嗎？好吧，就算四年了，我也不覺得這個系統(tǒng)過時了。

　　事實上，另一片文章的作者戴夫馬鬃達（國家利益雜志）她說比中國的這個系統(tǒng)還要老十倍的俄羅斯設計（比如P800）還是相當厲害的。那句（當前沒有國家部署高超音速導彈）的聲明，難道洲際彈道導彈不是高超音速導彈嗎？事實上，中國防空系統(tǒng)不就是反艦的洲際彈道導彈嗎？

        JeffAshe Chirpoevec • 19 days ago

　　Sigh...

　　You are talking to a Political Science major, my dear friend. You might as well be explaining the intricacies of String Theory to a tree stump.

　　哎。。。我親愛的朋友，你的談話對象是一名學政治科學的學生，這就好比你對牛彈琴。

　　JeffAshe • 19 days agoSo, type 1130, by all accounts has 11 barrels that fire 30mm rounds at a decent clip (around 10k/minute). It"s therefore reasonable to assume it"s effective against supersonic sea skimming AShMs. Perhaps the 90% claimed kill rate is against such missiles as the Russian SS-N-26 Strobile.

　　It"d be sensible for the USN to look into having a similar system.

　　因此，1130型防御系統(tǒng)，根據(jù)所有記錄顯示它有11個炮筒可以發(fā)射直徑30毫米子彈（約1萬發(fā)/分鐘）。因此可以用來對付掠海飛行的超音速反艦彈道。所以90%的命中率可能說是針對這種導彈，好比俄羅斯的SS-N-26球果導彈。

　　美國海軍如果具有類似的系統(tǒng)將是明智的。

　　George C JeffAshe • 17 days ago

　　don"t forget our operational Laser guns too

　　也不要忘了我們已經(jīng)可以操作的激光槍。